Trust us with the infrastructure levy, LEPs say


Business members of Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) are the right people to decide on the planned new infrastructure levy, the central support body for the 39 partnerships has said.

Under new plans unveiled by chancellor George Osborne at the Conservative Party conference, directly elected mayors could add a premium to business rates to pay for new infrastructure provided it is supported by a majority vote of the business members of the LEP.

In a strong defence of the local public and private partnerships, James Newman, chair of Sheffield City Region LEP argued that LEPs did not lack the transparency or accountability necessary to make decisions about the new levy.

And while he conceded LEPs operated on a ‘patchwork’ system, with different partnerships working in different ways, he rejected the idea that government should step in with more formal rules now the bodies handle not only billions of pounds through the local growth fund, but are also in line for a fiscal veto over the levy.

He added that ‘LEPs probably do more consultation than local councils on business growth issues’.

His comments come after Transport Network revealed concerns within the local infrastructure sector about a 'democratic deficit' and that LEPs lacked the transparency to be placed in charge of such key decision-making.

Mr Newman told Transport Network: ‘I welcome the chancellor’s statement and his confidence in the private sector to assist their local authority colleagues in making the right decisions on all matters related to economic growth. The private sector are interested in influencing decisions not controlling them and his proposals on the additional business rate levy mirror that.

James Newman: 'Influence not control.'

‘If businesses are going to be asked to pay more for infrastructure projects, which are supposed to support business growth, it is perfectly reasonable that business leaders should be given the opportunity to influence the decisions and eventual outcomes.

‘The private sector are much more likely to take a commercial, focused and non-partisan approach to deciding which infrastructure projects are the most important and deserving of any additional levy.’

He added: ‘The vast majority of LEPs appoint their private sector members by open advertisement so anybody from any organisation, large or small, can apply. A good chairman will ensure that there is an appropriate spread of geographical and sector representation.

'Most LEPs also have a structure of involving and communicating with all its business sectors, representative organisations and the third sector on a regular basis and, as such, probably do more consultation than local councils on business growth issues.’

In Mr Newman's LEP, a private sector representative is appointed by other private sector colleagues linked to or on the LEP, with their position reviewed every two or three years.

Mr Newman said private sector members had to be appointed by other private sector members to ensure equality and balance between the public and private halves of the LEP.

However it is by no means clear that all LEPs follow the same process. The Government left the organisation of LEPs largely in local hands.

In its LEP Assurance Framework, which came out in December 2014 more than three years after the first LEP was established, it states: ‘LEPs will have considerable freedom to determine how to implement the key practices and standards articulated in this national framework through their own local assurance framework.

‘LEPs have rightly established and structured themselves in very different ways, reflecting the differing needs and demands of each area, and we are not seeking to change that.’

The few rules set down for LEP board membership include the requirement for a private sector chair with the board made up of at least 50% private sector members, and public sector members drawn from local authority leaders and other relevant public sector organisations.

Mr Newman suggested there was no need to change the governance of LEPs now, stating there should only be reform ‘if someone can demonstrate what is happening now in practice isn't working; why legislate when you don’t need to?’

Mr Newman argued that a range of areas could be included under the umbrella of the infrastructure levy, including roads, transport, housing, broadband and schools but stopped short of suggesting non-physical infrastructure like skills should be included.

‘It’s a question of whether the infrastructure directly affects the economy, whether it’s an enabler of economic growth’ he said, before adding that other less business-orientated infrastructure demands, such as social care homes for instance, should not come under the infrastructure levy’s banner.

He also went on to say that projects for the levy's cash should have to follow the same value for money guidelines as used for the local growth fund, for transport this would include WebTAG compliance - government guidance on transport modelling and appraisal.  


Also see

comments powered by Disqus
highways jobs

Assistant Director (Planning, Regeneration & Transport)

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£87,791 per annum  
This is an exciting time to join Rotherham and make a real difference. We are looking for an outstanding Assistant Director who will bring... Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Corporate Director

Islington London Borough Council
Up to £135k
You will share our values and be passionate about helping us shape the Islington of the future. Islington, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Islington London Borough Council

Assistant Engineer

Cambridgeshire County Council
£21,074 - £30,756
Looking for strong team players interested in working with a variety of professional and community partners across Cambridgeshire. Cambridgeshire
Recuriter: Cambridgeshire County Council

Junior Energy Manager Apprentice

Brent Council
£15,000 p.a. inc.
The right person for this job will be pro-active and innovative in finding a way forward. Wembley, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Brent Council

Career Grade Drainage Engineer

Swindon Borough Council
£19,092 to £40,680 p.a
Working in the asset management team, you’ll support the work of the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) and Highways Authority. Swindon, Wiltshire
Recuriter: Swindon Borough Council

Highway Construction Project Manager

Brent Council
£50,442 - £53,526 p.a. inc.
We are looking for an accomplished highway construction project manager to support the delivery of two high priority highway schemes. Brent, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Brent Council

Traffic Signals & UTMC Manager

Bristol City Council
£42,683 - £45,591
Looking for someone with proven management experience, enthusiasm, creativity, vision and good communication skills. City of Bristol
Recuriter: Bristol City Council

Highways Estimator

Competitive Salary
As the Highways Estimator you will join a busy environment and become an integral part of the team. Hounslow (London Borough), London (Greater)
Recuriter: Ringway

Principal Highways Project Engineer

Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
£34,106 - £35,229 per annum
The post holder will be responsible for project managing the delivery of two highway projects on the Key Route Network. Knowsley (Metropolitan borough), Merseyside
Recuriter: Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council

Traffic Schemes Officer

Oxfordshire County Council
£22,021 - £29,636 per annum
An exciting opportunity has arisen to play a central role with the Traffic Team in the maintenance of the highway network... Kidlington, Oxfordshire
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Traffic Engineer

Telford & Wrekin Council
£29,055 to £30,756
This is an exciting opportunity to join Telford & Wrekin Council’s Traffic Management Team! Telford, Shropshire
Recuriter: Telford & Wrekin Council

Assistant Engineer – Traffic Regulation

Telford & Wrekin Council
£23,866 to £25,463
This is an exciting opportunity to join Telford & Wrekin Council’s Traffic Management Team. Telford, Shropshire
Recuriter: Telford & Wrekin Council

Environment Officer

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£29,909 – £32,233 Grade 11 - £33,136 - £35,229
All Environment Officers lead, project manage and/or co-ordinate large environmental projects... Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Highways Quantity Surveyor

Leicester City Council
£30,756 - £33,136 pro-rata per annum
Working in the Highways Maintenance Group, you will be responsible for the operational highway maintenance activities Leicester, Leicestershire
Recuriter: Leicester City Council

Highways Engineer/Inspector

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£22956 - £32637 per annum
Highways Engineer/Inspector - PermanentThere are plenty of reasons to take a closer look at Royal Greenwich.Royal Greenwich is undergoing a huge trans England, London, Woolwich
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Senior Project Engineer

Derbyshire County Council
Grade 13 £39,867 - £43,282 per annum
Derbyshire County Council is looking for an enthusiastic, enterprising and experienced laboratory manager Derbyshire
Recuriter: Derbyshire County Council

Engineer - Bridges

Cambridgeshire County Council
£32,825 - £35,401
We have a vacancy for a Structures Engineer working within the Bridge’s team! Cambridgeshire
Recuriter: Cambridgeshire County Council


Cambridgeshire County Council
£32,825 - £35,401
You will be required to lead the delivery of a wide range of highway improvements and maintenance projects... Cambridgeshire
Recuriter: Cambridgeshire County Council

Improvement and Asset Managers – Highways

North Yorkshire County Council
£42,683 to £45,591
We have exciting opportunities for Improvement and Asset Managers to join our highways service at North Yorkshire County Council. Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire County Council

Major Projects Manager – Highways and Transportation

North Yorkshire County Council
£48,000 to £55,840
This role will be pivotal to the effective delivery of our Highways and Transportation service... Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire County Council