Long-awaited CIHT shared space review released


The Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation (CIHT) has released its long-awaited review of shared space, an issue that has dogged the sector for years and proven one of the most controversial in highways and town planning.

‘Creating better streets: Inclusive and accessible places’ provides a series of recommendations to Government and industry, calling for a major shake-up in the sector’s approach to shared space.

The controversial road design is associated with the removal of street furniture, kerbs and crossings and has prompted campaigns, particularly from organisations representing the blind, as well as legal actions.

Among the report's conclusions is the point that the term shared space is unhelpful. CIHT proposes three new design approaches to replace shared space:

  • Pedestrian-Prioritised Street
  • Informal Street
  • Enhanced Street


The CIHT said there was a case for further guidance, based on further research, to help councils decide which type of street is most appropriate in any situation.

'The most significant decision required is when to move from the pedestrian-prioritised street type, where the driver should be seen as a guest, into the informal street type, where pedestrians will need to cross a defined carriageway. The differences between the informal and enhanced street are largely to do with the extent to which conventional traffic control measures are needed.'

The review concedes that there are 'key issues are around the use of kerbs and controlled crossings' and an inclusive approach to the design of these schemes is required.

'Future schemes seeking to improve the public realm through better street design need be promoted, designed, implemented and monitored against a series of predefined objectives with clear outcomes that can be measured in a consistent way,' the report states.

It calls for further guidance to help local authorities define outcomes for schemes around five key areas: 

  • inclusive environment
  • ease of movement
  • safety and public health
  • quality of place
  • economic benefit.


While the report was based on 11 case studies, the review reveals that: 'Only one case study had included creating an inclusive environment as an objective in the development of the scheme.'

The different schemes were employed for a wide range of reasons making an objective comparison difficult in some areas, CIHT sources suggested.

However the lack of evidence in certain areas is likely to cause concern among campaigners, particularly those who feel infrastructure such as kerbs and crossings are, in themselves, an objective standard for inclusivity.

The report states that in 'the majority of schemes, there was insufficient objective evidence to show whether there had been any adverse or positive effects'.

'Where there was any evidence available, some schemes could point to positive improvements, some were negative, while in others, the evidence was not available.'

However it adds: 'We are well aware that some user groups, including but not limited to, visually impaired people, have significant concerns. This does indicate that some user needs have not been met in some schemes, including in the consultation and engagement carried out, and this appears consistent with this objective not being identified as a specific aim for the majority of schemes.'


In terms of safety, the review finds that over half the scheme had no overall impact on safety, while in a few the situation had improved. No scheme was found to have significantly increased the number of collisions.

Economic benefits

The report states that: 'Five of the schemes have drawn evidence of positive improvements, the remainder have insufficient information available or are neutral there is no consistent approach to identifying the whole life cost of schemes and the identification of benefits in a way that allows direct comparison across the schemes.'


'Although there is some evidence that pedestrian prioritisation can be achieved through careful design, it is considered that adopting legislation in the UK that is similar to that underpinning successful Encounter Zones used in several other countries would make it much easier to introduce pedestrian-prioritised streets and create an inclusive and accessible public realm,' the report states.


The review itself has proven contentious and is almost two year later than expected after the Government originally said the CIHT was producing new guidance only to be told publicly by the institution this was not the case.

Andreas Markides, president of the CIHT said: ‘This review of shared space is the result of a great deal of work by those interested in making our streets better places for everyone. The issues around shared space have often been controversial and the recommendations that this review has made, if put into place, will help make our streets into the safe, inclusive environments that we need them to be.

‘CIHT has presented these recommendations to government and we will be coordinating a series of follow up discussions which we will report on in due course. CIHT will play an important role in helping provide increased clarity and consistency for decision makers and highways and transportation professionals.’

Recommendations in full:

1. As part of its wider work on accessibility, the government makes clear the duties of local authorities with regard to the Equality Act 2010 and other legislation with respect to the improvement of the public realm.

2. That the government recommends to local authorities that the framework of objectives used to carry out this review be used when developing public realm improvements to provide clarity into why these schemes are being carried out and inform design choices.

3. It should be made clear that appropriate outcomes should be set during the design and implementation phases of schemes and used to monitor their effectiveness once the schemes are complete. If necessary, authorities should carry out amendments in the light of these assessments, having regard to their statutory duties. The government and the sector should undertake work to develop the detail of the framework and outcomes and how they are measured.

4. Education and continuing professional development of those developing works in the public realm should specifically include the requirements around creating inclusive environments and accessibility. Professional institutions across the sector should take a lead in developing this approach.

7. The government should undertake research into the factors used to differentiate between the design approaches suggested in Conclusion 1.5 and develop guidance to assist their implementation by local authorities.

8. Government should move forward with its work on inclusive mobility and undertake research into the needs of people using the public realm, including how their needs differ due to visual impairment and other disabilities.

9. Government should review the potential to introduce legislation to enable local authorities to establish streets where pedestrians have priority, based on the successful Encounter Zones that are used in several other countries.

10. Government should undertake research into courtesy crossings, focusing on the relationship between various design features, context, user types, levels of driver courtesy and their relationship with formal crossings.

11. Government should clarify the legal position of users of courtesy crossings.

12. Government should review existing research on the most appropriate kerb height in actual street situations, considering factors such as detectability by visually impaired people and the effect of reduced kerb heights on traffic speed and over-running.

13. The government should review and update existing relevant highway and public-realm design guidance in order that a consistent approach is taken to the improvement of streets based upon the findings of this review. To facilitate the review all of the research identified in the recommendations of this review should be considered.

14. Government should give priority to the production of updated guidance on tactile paving to address the practical difficulties faced by designers when creating streetscape improvements that meet the needs of visually impaired people. This should expressly consider the best means of identifying defined crossing points and enabling people to find their way, particularly within level-surface streets.

15. Government should work with local authorities and technology companies to investigate the potential for new technology to assist in the creation of Inclusive environments.

Register now for full access

Register just once to get unrestricted, real-time coverage of the issues and challenges facing UK transport and highways engineers.

Full website content includes the latest news, exclusive commentary from leading industry figures and detailed topical analysis of the highways, transportation, environment and place-shaping sectors. Use the link below to register your details for full, free access.

Already a registered? Login

comments powered by Disqus
highways jobs

2 x Environmental Health Officer (Food, Health & Safety)

Dacorum Borough Council
£31,218 to £39,786 (Inclusive of London Fringe Weighting) + Car Allowance   
Seeking to appoint 2 x fully qualified Environmental Health Officer’s to work within our... Hertfordshire
Recuriter: Dacorum Borough Council

Senior Traffic Engineer

East Riding of Yorkshire Council
£32.029 - £34.788
We seek an enthusiastic and experienced traffic engineer to manage our Traffic Team. East Riding of Yorkshire
Recuriter: East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Head of Asset Management (Regeneration & Environment)

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£55,856 - £59,773
We have a current vacancy for the role of Head of Asset Management, and we are looking for a dynamic individual to lead the service Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Environmental Education Assistant

Brent Council
£22,779 - £24,030 p.a. inc. (pro-rata)
Looking for instructors who complement our enthusiastic, motivated and friendly staff team. Brent, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Brent Council

Structures Asset Manager

Kent County Council
£52,713 - £58,774 per annum (salary dependent on experience) 
If you have the ability to succeed in either of these roles and are able to prioritise competing demands and objectives, coupled with... Ashford, Kent
Recuriter: Kent County Council

Structures Senior Engineer

Kent County Council
Starting salary £33,082 per annum
Providing engineering support for maintenance of highway structures, liaising and working closely across KCC. Ashford, Kent
Recuriter: Kent County Council

Development Management Engineer

Warwickshire County Council
£37,849 - £39,782 per annum
The successful applicant for this post will be capable of taking the lead on work within the team associated with... Warwickshire
Recuriter: Warwickshire County Council

Permit Officer – Place

Enfield London Borough Council
£27,228 - £29,241
You will have the ability to understand and learn relevant legislation and be able to work on your own initiative but also work as part of... Enfield (London Borough), London (Greater)
Recuriter: Enfield London Borough Council

Senior Policy Planner

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£32,643 – £45,704 depending on skills
Are you looking for working arrangements that enhance your work-life balance? London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Strategic Manager Highways and Transport

Isle of Wight Council
£65,620.00 to £70,915.00
Are you are looking for an ambitious and rewarding career move to one of the best places to live and work in the country? Isle of Wight
Recuriter: Isle of Wight Council

Community Services Manager

Copeland Borough Council
Competitive Salary
Looking for an energised and enthusiastic candidate to lead and focus the service through the challenges set by the Resources and Waste Strategy. Moresby, Whitehaven
Recuriter: Copeland Borough Council

Highways Infrastructure and Maintenance Manager - Highways Network

Bridgend County Borough Council
£37,813 - £40,760 per annum
An exciting opportunity has arrived inside the Highway Asset Maintenance Team within the Communities Directorate. Bridgend (Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr)
Recuriter: Bridgend County Borough Council

Business Support Officers - Transport Team (2 Jobs)

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£19,554 - £21,166
Within the Transport Team you will be required to work flexibly in accordance with the needs of the service, which can men... Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Transportation Planning Manager

Brent Council
£55,638 - £58,779 p.a. inc.
ou will have an excellent knowledge and understanding of transport policy at both local and national level. Expertise of both people and... Wembley, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Brent Council

Commercial Contract Supervisor

Wirral Borough Council
£30,507 to £32,878
No holding back. No excuses. Just change Wirral. Wirral, Merseyside
Recuriter: Wirral Borough Council

Technical Officer – Pest Control

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£19,554 - £23,836
This job is temporary for up to 11 months from the date of appointment to cover the absence of the current post holder. Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Divisional Director Neighbourhoods & Sustainability

Glasgow City Council
£83,708 - £95,232 (LDR3a, Grade 11)
This innovative role will contribute to the Council Strategic Plan Theme of A Sustainable Low Carbon City Glasgow, Glasgow City
Recuriter: Glasgow City Council

Principal Transport Manager

Be First
Competitive Salary
As our Principal Transport Manager, you will deliver the Local Implementation Plan, ensuring the £2.4million TFL budget is used effectively London (Central), London (Greater)
Recuriter: Be First

Highway Operations Manager

Croydon London Borough Council
£43,590 - £45,585
We are seeking an enthusiastic, motivated and well organised highway operations manager Croydon (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recuriter: Croydon London Borough Council

Structures and Watercourse Manager

Croydon London Borough Council
We are seeking an enthusiastic, motivated and well organised manager to look over the structures team and wider Highway section. Croydon (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recuriter: Croydon London Borough Council