Garden Bridge at risk after Hodge finds £70m funding gap


The controversial Garden Bridge across the Thames should be scrapped if a capital funding gap of at least £70m cannot be filled, a highly critical independent review has recommended.

The review, by Dame Margaret Hodge, found that the finances of the Garden Bridge Trust, which is responsible for the project, ‘are in a precarious state and many outstanding risks remain unresolved’.

What the bridge will probably never look like

It also found that ‘there was not an open, fair and competitive process’ around the two Transport for London procurements for the project. ‘The two procurements revealed systemic failures and ineffective control systems at many levels,’ the review found.

Dame Margaret said: ‘I did not seek to ask whether the concept of a garden bridge over the River Thames is a good idea. But my review has found that too many things went wrong in the development and implementation of the Garden Bridge Project.

‘Value for money for the taxpayer has not been secured. It would be better for the taxpayer to accept the financial loss of cancelling the project than to risk the potential uncertain additional costs to the public purse if the project proceeds.’

She added: ‘In the present climate, with continuing pressures on public spending, it is difficult to justify further public investment in the Garden Bridge. I would urge the mayor not to sign any guarantees until it is confirmed that the private capital and revenue monies have been secured by the Garden Bridge Trust.'

The report also found that: ‘Decisions on the Garden Bridge were driven more by electoral cycles than value for taxpayers’ money.’

Costs have escalated from an early estimate of £60m to over £200m today and the risk to the taxpayer has intensified.

The review stated that the Trust has lost two major private donors and has pledges of £69m with no new pledges secured since August. With a public sector contribution of £60m, that leaves a gap in capital funding of at least £70m.

In addition, ‘very little progress has been made on raising money to fund the ongoing maintenance of a completed bridge,’ the review found.

John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'This utterly damning report proves what campaigners have been saying about this hugely expensive vanity project all along.

'There is absolutely no justification to carry on wasting taxpayers' money on this ludicrous scheme. Those who have managed to leave taxpayers out of pocket by allocating £60m to this project must hang their heads in shame, and the mayor must ensure that not a penny more of taxpayers' money is wasted on it.'

London mayor Sadiq Khan commissioned Dame Margaret in October to undertake the review, to assess whether value for money was being secured from the public sector contribution. It examined ‘the policies, procedures adopted to implement the Garden Bridge Project and the conduct of those involved’.


Also see

Register now for full access

Register just once to get unrestricted, real-time coverage of the issues and challenges facing UK transport and highways engineers.

Full website content includes the latest news, exclusive commentary from leading industry figures and detailed topical analysis of the highways, transportation, environment and place-shaping sectors. Use the link below to register your details for full, free access.

Already a registered? Login

comments powered by Disqus