Suffolk County Council is set to shelve plans to build three bridges on the River Orwell in Ipswich, despite having already spent £8.3m in development costs.
Dropping the scheme also means the city will lose the promised £78m of potential Government funding allocated to the works.
A report on the Upper Orwell Crossings project to the council’s cabinet recommends stopping the project with immediate effect, on the grounds that the council has been unable to obtain the additional funding of up to £43m required.
The main bridge would have crossed the river below Wet Dock island
A review by Jacobs last autumn had identified a significant cost increase, after which the project was ‘paused’.
The report to councillors states: ‘The estimated cost in the Outline Business Case was £96.649m. The Jacob’s Report has confirmed that the latest estimated cost falls between the range of £121.553m to £139.785m.
'Given that the current DfT [Department for Transport] contribution is £77.546m and the Council previously committed to the DfT that it would underwrite a local contribution of £19.103m, this leaves an additional capital funding requirement of up to £43.136m.'
It adds: ‘The report is urgent so that the existing project can be stopped and the existing project team structure disbanded so the County Council ceases, as soon as practicably possible, to incur cost.’
The main planned bridge would be cancelled outright, while the council will continue to seek funding for the two smaller bridges onto Wet Dock Island, one of which would involve the refurbishment of an existing bridge.
The report acknowledges that ‘the DfT funding of £77.546m to the project will be lost to Ipswich if the project does not proceed’.
In addition, the council report notes that £3.6m revenue and further £4.7m of capital funding has been spent (or committed) on the project.
It states: ‘If the existing scheme is stopped the Upper Orwell Crossing capital spend will have to be written off to revenue and funded from a revenue reserve. The total Suffolk County Council expenditure on the scheme will be approximately £8.3m (subject to final closure of the account).’
The report adds: ‘The largest component of the spend which has occurred is the use of external experts and contractors (c£7.3m) and covers items such as external members of the project, ground investigation and insurance. The second largest item is the in-house project team itself (£520k)’.
Matthew Hicks, council leader and cabinet member for economic development and infrastructure, said: ‘We are still prepared to commit financially towards the costs of building the two smaller bridges, providing we can find significant funding partners to work with us and up to a maximum of £10.8m, which respects the overall commitment we made in 2016 towards the local contribution, less the costs incurred to date.
‘It is very disappointing that we have been unable to secure any additional funding for the Upper Orwell Crossings and that the existing project will have to stop with immediate effect. We have exhausted all funding opportunities including The Department for Transport, HM Treasury, local businesses and other stakeholders.’
The council said the cost increase was ‘due to a range of factors including ground investigation costs, changes in bridge design post consultation and unforeseen procurement costs’.
The council’s cabinet will consider the report next Tuesday (29 January).
Transport Network has approached the DfT for comment.