UPDATE: Revised NPPF gives wriggle room on maximum parking standards. Click here to view reforms.
A major alliance of transport and planning groups has called for the Government to allow councils to set maximum parking standards for their areas under potential changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), in order to combat urban sprawl and congestion.
The group states that maximum parking standards – whereby planning authorities can set an upper limit of off-street parking spaces for a development – are 'a very important tool in the planning and development of our towns'.
The news comes as the government considers responses to its draft revised text of the NPPF, following a consultation which closed on 10 May.
In response the Local Government Technical Advisers Group (TAG), the London Forum of Amenity and Civic Societies, the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation, the Transport Planning Society and the Campaign for Better Transport said they 'strongly support the need for maximum parking standards'.
The proposal made by the groups states that the Government should delete the first sentence of draft revised NPPF para 107, which reads: 'Maximum parking standards for residential and non-residential development should only be set where there is a clear and compelling justification that they are necessary for managing the local road network.’
Instead, according to the alliance, the NPPF should state: 'Local planning authorities should set local parking standards for residential and non-residential uses, expressed as maximum parking standards, taking into account:
- the location of the development;
- its accessibility by and availability of public transport;
- the type, mix and use of development; and o the overall need to reduce the use of high-emission vehicles.
Transport Network spoke to Michael Bach, a senior adviser to TAG, who gave the following analysis in support of the proposed change:
‘The draft NNPF revision discourages the setting of maximum parking standards. If you don’t have maximum standards you either have no standards, which no one wants, or minimum standards, which could see some local authorities setting rising standards with the size of a housing development and they might have fairly relaxed standards to compete with neighbouring councils for office developments.
'The idea of maximum standards is to adjust to the locality. In an area with good public transport services you might adopt low maximum parking standards. We need standards that support the right development in the right place rather than unintentionally promote less sustainable patterns of development. What are they hoping for? Certainly not a free for all, but minimum parking standards would promote low density development.
‘The NPPF is a policy document and under this revised version it sets a clear disincentive for setting maximum standards. From about 2001 onwards most authorities have adopted maximum standards. This planned revision for the NPPF is turning the clock back. It’s not going to lead to higher density development. In London local authorities have been using maximum standards for the past 50 years. Who is saying that these standards are not suitable?
This is not an area the Government should be imposing a one-size-fits-all approach.
‘In setting standards, the NPPF advocates taking the local situation into account. However, the strong language is a real discouragement. It’s inappropriate. Local authorities only need to conform generally to the NPPF not in detail but they need to show why they have departed from it. The Planning Inspectorate must consider the NPPF and, as written, this is a very high test.’
Transport Network asked about current air pollution concerns and why the Government is proposing this change now.
‘There is a lack of joined up thinking. Someone will have lobbied for this revision to be written the way it is. There is no link with whatever else the Government might be trying to do.’