Controversy mounts over Silvertown tunnel

 

A local campaign group fighting the Silvertown Tunnel has raised concerns over due diligence and the background business case.

The Stop Silvertown campaign, which has garnered support from the Green Party and London councillors, has been steadily building its profile after Transport for London (TfL) awarded the contract for the £1bn project recently.

An FOI request sent by the campaigners revealed that despite assurances from the mayor's team that all alternative options to the tunnel were considered there seems to have been a lack of in-depth analysis of the single bore option.

TfL has sought to shrug off the accusations of misleading the public after deputy mayor Heidi Alexander wrote to campaigners stating: 'The case for the scheme also includes consideration of a single bore option with tidal flow.

'This option was ruled out due to substantial safety, operational and engineering challenges. While it is not explicitly referenced in the case for the scheme, a key reason for ruling out this option was that a single bore would need to be large enough to accomodate an emergency services access route and this is not feasible due to restrictied land availablity on both sides of the river.'

Ms Alexander also highlighted that TfL's conclusions were endorsed by the Development Consent Order Panel and the secretary of state, who in granting consent agreed with the panel that 'there has been sufficient assessment of alternatives'.

However, TfLs internal emails obtained by FOI suggest a discrepancy. 

Emails sent to David Rowe, head of Silvertown Tunnel Sponsorship at TfL, noted: 'Single bore bidirectional can be very robustly rejected on safety grounds ie not feasible.

  • 'Single bore one direction was considered for Blackwall and not considered feasible or operatioanlly desirable.
  • 'But single bore silvertown operated tidally we haven't covered in depth in the exam.'
  • A follow up email said: 'I hope the rather brief response doesn't turn out to trip us up - to be quite honest I'm slightly regretting the 'all feasible options' line...'

A TfL spokesperson said: 'A single bore option was actively considered in the design process early on. It is important to recognise that tunnels are safety critical environments where the impact of collisions and fires pose even greater risk to road users. The confined space within tunnels can make evacuation and emergency services access much more difficult.

'Consequently, a significantly larger single bore tunnel would be required to enable the emergency services to access it and safely evacuate. However, due to the limited land and physical constraints on either side of the river, there is insufficient space for a such a design. Due to these reasons and wider operational and safety concerns associated with tidal operation, a single bore tunnel was ruled out.

'Our conclusion was endorsed by the DCO Panel and by the secretary of state, who in granting consent confirmed: ‘The Secretary of State notes the options appraised and alternatives canvassed… and he agrees with the Panel that there has been sufficient assessment of alternatives’.'

Business case

The Stop Silvertown campaign also noted that the business case rests on a charge for the tunnel, which could be reduced at any future mayor's discretion after consultation with organisations representative of regular tunnel users - who might well be supportive of lowerng the charge.

If future tunnel charges were lowered this could also result in induced traffic demand in the area, creating more congestion. 

The Stop Silvertown campaign said: 'All the congestion and air quality forecasts for the Silvertown Tunnel project are an elaborate fiction - because they're all based on the pretence that future Mayors will set exactly the level of toll that this mayor wants them to set.'

A TfL spokesman highlighted that the DCO states clearly that the tunnel has to be subject to a user charge – so there is no option to not to have a user charge.

London mayor's are often tempted to promise fare and toll reductions and freezes, however they often do not live up to these promises such is the pressure on TfL's budget. Mayor Khan is a noticeable exception to this and has run into funding issues as a result.

Register now for full access


Register just once to get unrestricted, real-time coverage of the issues and challenges facing UK transport and highways engineers.

Full website content includes the latest news, exclusive commentary from leading industry figures and detailed topical analysis of the highways, transportation, environment and place-shaping sectors. Use the link below to register your details for full, free access.

Already a registered? Login

 
comments powered by Disqus
 
 
highways jobs

Highway Rangers

Epping Forest District Council
£24,354
Epping Forest District Council (EFDC) is seeking to recruit two Highway Rangers within our Contracts and Technical Services department Epping Forest, Waltham Abbey
Recuriter: Epping Forest District Council

Head of Highways, Transport and Recycling

Powys County Council
£77,282 – £84,102 per annum 
We are seeking to recruit a highly motivated and inspirational leader as our new Head of Highways, Transport and Recycling here in Powys. Powys
Recuriter: Powys County Council

Waste Loaders

City of York Council
£9.52 per hour
Do you have a current UK driving licence? York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council

General Operatives/Drivers/Gardeners

City of York Council
£9.52 to £10.30 dependent upon experience
Do you have a current UK driving licence? York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council

Programme Manager - Highways

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£42,683 - £44,632
Are you an experienced, talented and collaborative Programme Manager with experience of supporting public sector transformation and change? Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

(Senior) Environmental Health Officer/Enforcement Officer

Brent Council
£35,724 - £41,706 p.a. inc.
We are looking for Environmental Health Officers; EHRB registered and has current experience in food safety and health & safety enforcement. Brent, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Brent Council

Road worker/Ground worker

City of York Council
£10.30 per hour
Have you successfully worked as part of a team? York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council

HGV Relief Driver

North West Leicestershire District Council
Salary Band D, £21,589- £24,799 per year (pro rata to period of contract)
We are looking to recruit temporary HGV Relief Drivers with occasional loading duties to join NWLDC’s busy Waste Services Team. Coalville, Leicestershire
Recuriter: North West Leicestershire District Council

Waste Services Worker (Loader)

North West Leicestershire District Council
Band B, £18,795 - £19,171 per year (pro rata to the length of contract)
We are looking for Waste Operations Loaders to join our Waste Services Team to undertake waste collection and other related duties. Coalville, Leicestershire
Recuriter: North West Leicestershire District Council

Chargehand/Ganger

City of York Council
£11.09 per hour
Do you have experience of excavation, reinstatement and footway maintenance schemes? York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council

Sustainability & Resilience Manager (maternity cover)

Essex County Council
£51510.0 - £58752 per annum
This fixed-term contract will begin in August 2020 and is expected to last until October 2021 Interviews scheduled to be held Wednesday 10th June 2020 England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Civil Service Deputy Director Roles

GOV.UK
£70,000 - £117,800 & excellent rewards
We’re looking for significant experience of engaging at C-Suite and Board levels, excellent partnership-building and... England
Recuriter: GOV.UK

Engineer (Highways Scheme Design)

Medway Council
£31,888 - £37,646 per annum
The post-holder will be required to have highway engineering expertise in order to contribute to efficient and effective provision of... Medway City Estate, Rochester
Recuriter: Medway Council

Principal Flood Risk Officer

Lancashire County Council
£42,683-£46,566
We have an exciting opportunity for a Principal Floor Risk Officer Lancashire
Recuriter: Lancashire County Council

Resources and Waste Commercial and Contracts Manager

Northumberland County Council
£47,107 - £50,394
We are looking for a strategic, innovative and performance-focused leader to join us as Resources and Waste; Commercial and Contracts Manager. County Hall, Morpeth, Northumberland
Recuriter: Northumberland County Council

Principal Planning Liaison Officer X3

Somerset County Council
£33,799 to £37,849 per annum
We have a number of fantastic opportunities in Somerset at various levels Taunton, Somerset
Recuriter: Somerset County Council

Principal Estate Roads Engineer

Somerset County Council
£33,799 to £37,849 per annum
We have a number of fantastic opportunities in Somerset at various levels Taunton, Somerset
Recuriter: Somerset County Council

Principal Travel Plan Officer

Somerset County Council
£33,799 to £37,849 per annum
We have a number of fantastic opportunities in Somerset at various levels Taunton, Somerset
Recuriter: Somerset County Council

Assistant Estate Roads Engineer x2

Somerset County Council
£25,295 to £28,785 per annum
We have 2 exciting opportunities for enthusiastic and committed individuals to join our Highways Development Management Team Taunton, Somerset
Recuriter: Somerset County Council

Design Services Manager

Lincolnshire County Council
£50,430 - £55,503
We are a team of mixed experience and skills, proud to serve the people of Lincolnshire and have fun whilst doing so! Lincolnshire
Recuriter: Lincolnshire County Council