£3M extra as bypass costs accelerate

 
The Department for Transport has provided Stoke-on-Trent council with £3M extra for a bypass that increased in cost by 59% in nine months due to the need to stabilise mine workings.
 
The DfT has revealed that nearly seven months into construction work of the Tunstall northern bypass, Stoke-on-Trent informed the Government that the scheme cost had increased due to ‘significantly poorer than anticipated ground conditions’.
 
But Steve Berry, of the DfT’s regional and local major projects division, has rejected suggestions that agreeing to cover most of the increase sent out the wrong messages to councils.
 
The 1.5km bypass, designed to remove traffic from the residential area of Tunstall, was expected to cost £7.8M when it was granted full approval in October 2006, but this had risen by 59% to £12.3M by the following July.
 
Ian Norris, a Tunstall resident who campaigned against the road on the basis of its impact on Scotia Valley, told Surveyor he cried foul over the DfT’s decision to provide £3M of the £4.6M cost hike.
 
‘It seems as though local councils can get away with submitting low costs to make their schemes seem better value for money than they really are, safe in the knowledge that these low tenders will be covered by the Government.’
 
He was backed by the Campaign for Better Transport, which has conducted research on trunk and motorway schemes approved since 1997 that indicates an average cost overrun of 55%.
 
Berry conceded that the road was in a site of known mining activity. But he accepted Stoke-on-Trent’s explanation that the drilling of boreholes during the detailed design phase had failed to provide a full picture of ground conditions, which were revealed during construction.
 
The Department was ‘not obliged to provide any further funding’ but to not do so ‘would have serious adverse consequences for the delivery of the council’s other transport objectives,’ he said.
 
Mark Meredith, Stoke’s elected mayor, was ‘delighted’ that the Government had accepted the ‘watertight case’ made by city technical officers. But Norris hoped that a full report explaining the cost hike would be submitted to councillors.

Register now for full access


Register just once to get unrestricted, real-time coverage of the issues and challenges facing UK transport and highways engineers.

Full website content includes the latest news, exclusive commentary from leading industry figures and detailed topical analysis of the highways, transportation, environment and place-shaping sectors. Use the link below to register your details for full, free access.

Already a registered? Login

 
comments powered by Disqus